from The Incidental Economist at http://bit.ly/2npSPD2 on January 30, 2018 at 04:54PM
That’s the title of a new piece of mine that came out in JAMA this morning. It’s pretty timely: a lawsuit was filed last week challenging CMS’s approval of Kentucky’s waiver, which includes work requirements. More waivers, and more litigation, are sure to come.
[In general,] the courts have not been moved by the argument—true though it may be—that Congress never meant for section 1115 to be a vehicle for the adoption of sweeping, controversial, and partisan reforms to Medicaid. Instead of winning in court, the opponents of work requirements may need to win some elections.
For a contrary view, take a look at Emily Parento’s and Nicole Huberfeld’s op-ed in the Lexington-Herald Leader.