from Social Science & Medicine at http://bit.ly/2OuJEzY on November 29, 2019 at 03:12PM
Publication date: Available online 28 November 2019
Source: Social Science & Medicine
Author(s): Julie Vallée, Martine Shareck, Guillaume Le Roux, Yan Kestens, Katherine L. Frohlich
Neighbourhood resources are often considered to be spatially accessible to people when they are located close to their place of residence, a perspective which overlooks individuals’ unique lived experience of their neighbourhood and how they define it. Drawing on the relational approach to place and on Sen’s capability approach, we explore spatial accessibility to health-related resources, and the social gradient therein, in light of people’s place experiences. Using data from 1101 young adults from Montreal (Canada) who participated in the Interdisciplinary Study of Inequalities in Smoking (ISIS), we compare the social gradients in the presence of health-related resources located (i) within uniform areas (defined as circular buffers and road-network buffers) around participants’ place of residence; and (ii) within participants’ self-defined neighbourhoods. Social inequalities in accessibility to a diversity of health-related resources (grocery stores, fruit and vegetable stores, eating and drinking places, recreational sports centres, civic, social, and fraternal organizations, bike paths, parks, social services, libraries, dental offices, physician offices) were more pronounced in self-defined neighbourhoods than in uniform buffer areas. Neglecting the variability in people’s place experiences may distort the assessment of social inequalities in accessibility, and ultimately, of neighbourhood effects on health inequalities.